Monday, November 29, 2010
Tuesday, October 05, 2010
Saturday, September 18, 2010
Friday, September 17, 2010
Disinflation
So.
I started the previous blog subject under the impression that the real-estate apocalypse was just around the corner... that the very low interest rates we observed last fall were only the result of government intervention in the market, and as soon as the government stopped intervening, rates would increase.
I clearly was off the mark. Interest rates are lower than they have ever been.
So, I've shut my trap on that old topic. Mostly, I'm watching Krugman's blog and CalculatedRisk. I'm kinda impressed at two things about Krugman.
1) He's just been right so frequently over the past two years; like, dead on the money right.
2) People still seem to shoot for the mean between his suggestions and the people who have been wrong for so long who have been saying the opposite and are still saying the opposite. It's like, you have two crystal ball gazers, one saying "go west" and one saying "go east" and so you head south -- except, the guy saying "go east" wants you to ignore the fact he's been wrong in every prediction he's made up until this point.
It's wild.
I mean -- I was one of those crystal ball gazers saying "EAST" and damn if I didn't screw the pooch on that one.
So, for a long time, Krugman has been warning that we're in an environment that will produce deflation. And the symptom before deflation is "disinflation." That is, inflation expectation decreases. People have to predict what inflation will be, and when they predict lower and lower inflation, it actually turns in to lower and lower inflation, until you hit the 0 mark, and then it turns into greater and greater deflation in a pretty nasty vicious cycle.
So
CPI numbers came out this week and they look a lot like disinflation. It's been going on for a while, but the point of these numbers is simply that it's still going on. It's not a fluke. It's what Krugman predicted. Calculated risk has the graph.
disinflation graph
I started the previous blog subject under the impression that the real-estate apocalypse was just around the corner... that the very low interest rates we observed last fall were only the result of government intervention in the market, and as soon as the government stopped intervening, rates would increase.
I clearly was off the mark. Interest rates are lower than they have ever been.
So, I've shut my trap on that old topic. Mostly, I'm watching Krugman's blog and CalculatedRisk. I'm kinda impressed at two things about Krugman.
1) He's just been right so frequently over the past two years; like, dead on the money right.
2) People still seem to shoot for the mean between his suggestions and the people who have been wrong for so long who have been saying the opposite and are still saying the opposite. It's like, you have two crystal ball gazers, one saying "go west" and one saying "go east" and so you head south -- except, the guy saying "go east" wants you to ignore the fact he's been wrong in every prediction he's made up until this point.
It's wild.
I mean -- I was one of those crystal ball gazers saying "EAST" and damn if I didn't screw the pooch on that one.
So, for a long time, Krugman has been warning that we're in an environment that will produce deflation. And the symptom before deflation is "disinflation." That is, inflation expectation decreases. People have to predict what inflation will be, and when they predict lower and lower inflation, it actually turns in to lower and lower inflation, until you hit the 0 mark, and then it turns into greater and greater deflation in a pretty nasty vicious cycle.
So
CPI numbers came out this week and they look a lot like disinflation. It's been going on for a while, but the point of these numbers is simply that it's still going on. It's not a fluke. It's what Krugman predicted. Calculated risk has the graph.
disinflation graph
Wednesday, September 15, 2010
Thursday, May 20, 2010
Interest rates: still low, but CR was still right
CR predicted that the spread between the yield on the treasury's 10-year bonds and mortgage interest rates would widen by about 0.3% after the Fed ended its MBS purchasing program, and yes, the spread has widened. This is not because mortgage interest rates have started climbing, as I assumed they would. Apparently there were a lot of us out there pointing to the end of the Fed MBS purchase program and a 0.3% climb in the mortgage interest rates and making a big deal out of it.
Krugman and SeattleBubbleBlog both pointed out how these "the sky is falling" claims were in error. I was making them to convince sellers that they had waited too long if they wanted to sell while the selling was good. But there's a flip side: a lot of buyers seem to think lower interest rates are in their favor, and so the dire warnings that interest rates were headed up were propagated to scare home buyers into acting now.
I have maintained that interest rates are neutral. All buyers are able to get mortgages at the same rate, and so the lower the rate, the more a buyer has to bid in order to win the auction.
Now, my thinking does discount all-cash buyers who don't need loans and who are otherwise unaffected by interest rates. If you're comparing all-cash buyers to mortgage-taking buyers, then low interest rates do offer mortgage takes an advantage: the lower the interest rate, the more principle they can bid for the property. All-cash buyers are somewhat rare, however. As this bubble has deflated, though, there have been a number of reports that all-cash buyers are out in great numbers.
.. anyways, I just wanted to say CR was right.
Krugman and SeattleBubbleBlog both pointed out how these "the sky is falling" claims were in error. I was making them to convince sellers that they had waited too long if they wanted to sell while the selling was good. But there's a flip side: a lot of buyers seem to think lower interest rates are in their favor, and so the dire warnings that interest rates were headed up were propagated to scare home buyers into acting now.
I have maintained that interest rates are neutral. All buyers are able to get mortgages at the same rate, and so the lower the rate, the more a buyer has to bid in order to win the auction.
Now, my thinking does discount all-cash buyers who don't need loans and who are otherwise unaffected by interest rates. If you're comparing all-cash buyers to mortgage-taking buyers, then low interest rates do offer mortgage takes an advantage: the lower the interest rate, the more principle they can bid for the property. All-cash buyers are somewhat rare, however. As this bubble has deflated, though, there have been a number of reports that all-cash buyers are out in great numbers.
.. anyways, I just wanted to say CR was right.
Thursday, May 13, 2010
REOs up 45% YoY
There are three stages to foreclosure:
1) Notice of default. (NOD) The bank says "hey, you, you quit paying us three months ago!"
2) Notice of Trustee Sale. (NTS) The bank says "hey, you, you quit paying us nine months ago, we're going to have to take back your house"
Banks have been chugging along filing NODs and NTSs, but have stopped short of actually taking possession of houses. Instead, they have let non-performing assets sit on their books with both fingers crossed, hoping by some miracle that their borrowers would cure. It's easier than acknowledginga loss their own stupidity, I suppose.
3) Real Estate Owned (REO). The bank actually takes possession of the house and evicts the squatting defaulters who had been occupying it RENT FREE for the past 9 months at least. Turns out the delay between stage 1 and stage 3 has been several years in 25% of cases. Banks had been purposefully holding back inventory from hitting the market.
April REO activity is up 45% over last year. REO activity is at a record high, up only 1% from last month, but none the less, at unprecedentedly high levels. This increase in REO activity is occurring even as NOD and NTS activity is slowing.
This link, of course, comes from CalculatedRisk.
1) Notice of default. (NOD) The bank says "hey, you, you quit paying us three months ago!"
2) Notice of Trustee Sale. (NTS) The bank says "hey, you, you quit paying us nine months ago, we're going to have to take back your house"
Banks have been chugging along filing NODs and NTSs, but have stopped short of actually taking possession of houses. Instead, they have let non-performing assets sit on their books with both fingers crossed, hoping by some miracle that their borrowers would cure. It's easier than acknowledging
3) Real Estate Owned (REO). The bank actually takes possession of the house and evicts the squatting defaulters who had been occupying it RENT FREE for the past 9 months at least. Turns out the delay between stage 1 and stage 3 has been several years in 25% of cases. Banks had been purposefully holding back inventory from hitting the market.
April REO activity is up 45% over last year. REO activity is at a record high, up only 1% from last month, but none the less, at unprecedentedly high levels. This increase in REO activity is occurring even as NOD and NTS activity is slowing.
This link, of course, comes from CalculatedRisk.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)